Hong Kong's Regulatory Landscape
Hong Kong’s Strategic Position in Virtual Assets
Hong Kong has deliberately positioned itself as a leading jurisdiction for digital asset development, aiming to become a global hub that bridges traditional finance with the emerging blockchain economy. The government’s approach is guided by policy statements from the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), which emphasize balancing market innovation with investor protection. This dual strategy enables Hong Kong to remain competitive against regional peers such as Singapore and Dubai while reinforcing its long-standing reputation for regulatory certainty under the principle of “one country, two systems.”
Regulatory Authorities and Supervisory Roles
Oversight of virtual assets is grounded in Hong Kong’s existing financial regulatory architecture. The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), operating under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571), regulates virtual assets that fall within the legal definition of “securities” or “futures contracts,” requiring intermediaries and trading platforms to obtain the appropriate Type 1 (dealing in securities), Type 7 (providing automated trading services), or Type 9 (asset management) licenses. The HKMA, under the Banking Ordinance (Cap. 155), supervises banks and payment systems, including their exposures to virtual assets and stablecoin-related activities. Both authorities also enforce compliance with the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance (AMLO) (Cap. 615), which imposes robust customer due diligence and record-keeping requirements on Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs).
Key Legislative and Licensing Developments
Recent reforms illustrate Hong Kong’s commitment to legal clarity. The VASP licensing regime under the AMLO came into effect in June 2023, requiring all centralized virtual asset trading platforms carrying on business in Hong Kong or actively marketing to Hong Kong investors to be licensed by the SFC. Operators must meet fit-and-proper tests, implement stringent risk management controls, and comply with ongoing reporting and disclosure obligations. In December 2024, the government gazetted the Stablecoin Bill, introducing a licensing framework for fiat-referenced stablecoin (FRS) issuers, to be administered jointly by the HKMA and the SFC. These measures align Hong Kong’s framework with international recommendations from the Financial Stability Board (FSB) and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), signaling the jurisdiction’s ambition to be a standard-setter in global virtual asset regulation.
Innovation, Sandboxes, and Global Connectivity
Despite the tightening of supervisory requirements, Hong Kong continues to encourage innovation in a controlled environment. Regulatory sandboxes—operated by both the SFC and the HKMA—allow financial institutions and fintech firms to trial blockchain-based solutions such as tokenized securities, cross-border settlement systems, and retail virtual asset products under close regulatory oversight. These initiatives sit alongside broader strategies, including the Green and Sustainable Finance Cross-Agency Steering Group’s efforts to explore blockchain for ESG markets. By combining strict licensing regimes with controlled experimentation, Hong Kong positions itself as both a trusted and progressive marketplace for digital finance, reinforcing its ambition to serve as a global connector between virtual asset innovation and traditional capital markets.
Find out exactly which licence your business needs—start using our tool today
Your business deserves compliance confidence—start here.